flyboy_fox: (>/ (Pic by way_past_cool - thanks!!))
[personal profile] flyboy_fox
"[...] or other material -- including drawings and text -- that explicitly depicts minors under the age of 18 (real or not) in a graphic sexual context." ... "Smut focused on a twelve year old is not okay."

Wow, (explicit) Sontails is banned o.o ... XD;; I never posted anything hardcore anyway. But... now I'm tempted to o.o;;

Date: 2007-07-19 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] insanepurin.livejournal.com
That's what aging up is for. ;D

Date: 2007-07-19 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
NAO~ ;_; I WILL NOT BE DEPRIVED OF MY PRINCIPLES.

Date: 2007-07-19 07:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nikkicub.livejournal.com
Boy, that's a lot of pissed-off yaoi fans to deal with. NO SHOTA FOR YOU! >O

Mm, aging-up. You know you want a Late Teen Tails.

Date: 2007-07-19 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
I don't like aging up. I already aged up 8-year-old SEGA-canon Tails to 12 >.> Sonic characters aren't like 'real' people. Therefore their ages shouldn't necessarily equate a particular maturity. Sonic characters fly planes, save planets, even fire guns. Why can't they have sex too? ;_;

Date: 2007-07-19 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nikkicub.livejournal.com
While I'm not sure Tails specifically has that kind of emotional maturity just yet, I do see your point. And at the end of the day, an eight-year-old 'real' fox is mature!

But imagining how he might look in ten years is still fun, I think. Even aside from all this hullabaloo.

Date: 2007-07-19 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
At the end of the day, the point is, it's fandom. How many different universes are there already, anyway? Different ages in each one, too XD Anywhere from 4 - 14. I don't post hardcore stuff. I never have. I make PG-13 allusions, and therefore I'm probably perfectly safe. But I don't like the thought that any further could get me deleted... just for writing/drawing smut ^^; Which I don't do, as I've said. But I'm still gonna get self-righteous about it :P

Date: 2007-07-19 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nikkicub.livejournal.com
Rant away, my little fox, rant away. :D

All joking aside, I think it's a good policy. Still, catch-alls are tricky, and we're dealing with a pretty unique universe in this case. Even without that... well, for instance, such circumstances(in a far less cute way)are a pretty central part of one of my fiction character's background, and now I can get banned for alluding to what makes this character what he is? Humbug, I say. It's a sticky thing... and quite frankly, much as I might disapprove of a lot of shota/lolicon work, they're fictional characters. We're not exactly Pedo International here. If I want cute Sontails fluff(or less fluff as the case may be*cough*)or deal with Ilya's background... well, it's not a real kid's problem, is it?

Ah, overzealousness.

Date: 2007-07-19 08:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
I'm also surprised by their decision to unveil this new wording immediately before the new Harry Potter book is released o.o The HP fans were the ones who were most up in arms by having their loli/shota/slash communities suspended. Methinks they'll be the source of much ire again this time ^^;

Date: 2007-07-19 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nikkicubwrites.livejournal.com
Oooo. I hadn't thought of that. Popcorn? :D

Date: 2007-07-19 08:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
As long as it's toffee or cheese :D *Munches*

Date: 2007-07-19 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowdingo.livejournal.com
*becomes the devil on your shoulder* Do it, DDDOOOOOOOO IIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anyway, heh... excuse me, I've had cola. And fill in the equation of doom:
[livejournal.com profile] shadowdingo + Cola = ?

But, if I can manage some seriousness... *bangs head on desk* *coughs* I can see why they put the policy in place, what with some people getting offended by this sort of stuff. But eh... probably won't stop people.

Date: 2007-07-19 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
It shouldn't matter if it offends some people, if it's not illegal. No one is being FORCED to look at it, and even if I put it friends-only with a huge warning tag, it would still be taken down by this policy. I AM very tempted to test the limits though... XD;

Date: 2007-07-19 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowdingo.livejournal.com
Lol, what I meant when I said "probably won't stop people" XD. Heh heh... temptation is but an evil thing, lol. Just like this cola is staring me in the face. Will not have the cola, will not have the cola

...

*pours glass and drinks cola*
Damn, lol. XD

And aye... go ahead, I say. As said in below comment, it's your journal, so it's your space really. ^^;;

Date: 2007-07-19 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leonskennedy827.livejournal.com
It's your LJ, shouldn't people be allowed to post what they want in it if they warn people?

Date: 2007-07-19 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
My thoughts exactly :\ If I put it behind a cut-tag and say beforehand that it's explicit and deals with characters who are technically minors... what's the problem?

Another thing that bothers me is that the policy refers to a minor as "under 18", but in the UK and other countries and even some American states, the age of consent is 16 :\ So the policy is including smut about 17-years-olds as 'underage', when in many places it isn't!

Date: 2007-07-19 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leonskennedy827.livejournal.com
I'm sure they're gonna get more than a few complaints about this, 'cuz that is true

Date: 2007-07-20 01:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] k-yamato.livejournal.com
:o...
NO
FUCKING
WAY.

Date: 2007-07-20 10:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
YES
FUCKING
WAY.
:o

Date: 2007-07-20 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hamlover.livejournal.com
I'm not sure when a fox reaches sexual maturity, but I'm guessing it's within eight years. Not sure about hedgehogs either.

So I think it counts as beastiality. What are the rules around that?

http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x241/Kuro-ku/to_1172816291502_007.jpg

THEY BE AMINALS!!!1

Date: 2007-07-20 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
Gah, Klonoa/Tails... DO NOT WANT D:

Date: 2007-07-20 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Aww, I like explicit Sontails... =P
-Collision Cat

Date: 2007-07-22 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chocomookielove.livejournal.com
So, that's why everybody is freaking out.

As I see it, there's plenty of other sites that DO allow that sort of content, in fact, there's quite a few sites that focus purely on that. (Note, I'm refering to fanfiction/fanart/not real.) So why freak out because -one- site happened to suddenly ban it?

If I drew or wrote that sort of stuff, I'd probably be putting it on a different site in the first place, a site more suited to that kind of content.

Date: 2007-07-22 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
Hah, hi there!

Well, the whole thing isn't really even relevent to my interests (I don't post anything hardcore), but I just thought it was an interesting talking point.

The thing with LJ is that it's a lot more community-based than most 'sites that just 'host' stuff. Also, a lot of people have built up a whole network here of sharing their art/fics and discussing things related to those ideas. It would be very difficult to transfer an entire community elsewhere.

I can see why some people are worried/upset, but I do think some people ARE blowing it a little out of proportion. It's annoying, I'm sure, but it's not armageddon.
Page generated Jan. 11th, 2026 07:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios